University of Oregon Study Exposes Limitations of Forensic DNA Techniques
November 25, 2024 — By Laurel Hamers
A new study from the University of Oregon highlights significant limitations in a common forensic technique used to link DNA evidence to suspects at crime scenes. Published this fall in the journal iScience, the research reveals that forensic DNA analysis may inaccurately implicate innocent individuals when interpreting DNA mixtures from genetically similar populations.
As forensic scientists increasingly utilize sensitive DNA analysis methods—capable of detecting trace amounts of DNA from skin cells—the challenge arises when these samples are composed of DNA from multiple contributors. Rori Rohlfs, the lead researcher and a data scientist at the university, and her team discovered that the accuracy of DNA mixture analysis is significantly compromised in groups with low genetic diversity. The study indicates that these mixtures are more likely to yield false positives, meaning that innocent people could be wrongly associated with a crime.
To investigate these inaccuracies, Rohlfs and her research team analyzed previously published genetic databases to assess variations in genetic markers among different ancestries. Their simulations revealed that the likelihood of erroneous associations increases when DNA from more individuals is present, reinforcing the need for caution when interpreting forensic DNA evidence in diverse social contexts.
Rohlfs emphasizes the ethical dimensions of this research. She notes that many datasets used lack proper informed consent, often involving samples from incarcerated individuals. Consequently, her team restricted their dataset to those where consent was verifiable, which may limit the findings.
Rohlfs’s ongoing work at the University of Oregon aims to further explore the accuracy of emerging forensic DNA techniques, underscoring a growing need for precision and ethical standards in forensic science.
Source
Photo credit news.uoregon.edu