Oregon House Committee Rejects Wildfire Map Repeal, Sparks Controversy
The Oregon House Committee on Climate and Energy voted against advancing a bill to repeal the state’s contentious wildfire risk map, igniting fierce backlash from Republican members. Critics claim that Democrats are leveraging the repeal as a bargaining chip in exchange for votes on wildfire funding initiatives that utilize kicker rebate funds.
Democrats on the committee, including Rep. Pam Marsh of Ashland, argue that delaying the measure for further discussion will allow them to shape a more comprehensive wildfire management strategy. Senate Bill 83, which passed unanimously in the Senate, aims to eliminate a map that identifies areas at high wildfire risk and dictates mitigation responsibilities for property owners.
Resistance against the map stems from rural lawmakers and constituents who argue the analysis oversimplifies wildfire risks, adversely affecting property owners. Sen. Jeff Golden, advocating for the repeal, emphasized that the map has fostered "hostility and mistrust," counterproductive to addressing wildfire challenges.
In the wake of the committee’s decision, Republican Rep. Virgle Osborne criticized the approach, stating it prioritizes legislative agendas over the needs of Oregonians. Rep. Darcey Edwards voiced her discontent, emphasizing her preference for a direct vote.
Republicans have accused Democrats of using the map repeal to extract $1 billion from kicker tax rebates, alleging that Speaker Julie Fahey and Governor Tina Kotek are aiming to secure Republican support for wildfire funding. This alternative plan would divert kicker funds into a fire prevention investment fund, generating sustainable revenue for wildfire efforts.
Golden refuted the claims of any deal, clarifying his intent for unanimous support of the repeal. Committee Chair John Lively insisted that the map’s consideration in a broader legislative context would not jeopardize its chances. As discussions continue, the focus remains on finding a unified strategy to manage wildfire risks effectively.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.