Bentz Defends Medicaid Changes in Virtual Town Hall
Oregon’s Rep. Cliff Bentz addressed constituents in a virtual town hall, defending the Republican decision to implement new work and citizenship requirements for Medicaid eligibility and emphasizing the “travesty” of able-bodied, non-working Americans benefiting from the program. Representing Oregon’s 2nd District, Bentz responded to a limited selection of questions during the one-hour event, citing a preference for virtual meetings to reach more constituents amid concerns regarding in-person gatherings.
Bentz highlighted several aspects of the GOP’s recent budget proposal, including proposed tax cuts for individuals and Social Security benefits, alongside increased federal spending on border security. However, the most pressing concerns among constituents revolved around potential impacts on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid. The proposed cuts could lead to $300 billion reductions in SNAP and $625 billion in Medicaid funding over the next decade. The new requirements mandate that Medicaid recipients between 19 and 65 must work, volunteer, or engage in educational programs for at least 80 hours each month.
Critics, including former Governor John Kitzhaber, argue that most Medicaid recipients are already employed, thus questioning the necessity of additional work requirements. Kitzhaber labeled the bill as “immoral,” contending that it unfairly targets vulnerable populations and misrepresents the true nature of Medicaid beneficiaries.
Bentz, in contrast, affirmed that the changes do not constitute cuts, but rather an obligation for capable individuals to work. He dismissed concerns over rural hospitals potentially suffering from stricter Medicaid access requirements. Meanwhile, he assured attendees that the Republican bill includes provisions for reducing the rising costs of prescription drugs.
This event reflects a growing national discourse around the intersection of healthcare, work requirements, and social safety nets, particularly as local impacts remain heavily scrutinized.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
