At 97 years old, Judge Pauline Newman is the oldest full-time federal judge on the bench, facing pressure from colleagues to step aside due to concerns about her ability to serve. Appointed in 1984, Newman has been locked in a legal battle with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, who sanctioned her for refusing a neurological test as part of a disability investigation. There is no easy process for removing federal judges, who have lifetime appointments, leading to challenges in dealing with aging judges who may no longer be fit to serve.
The issue of aging judges extends beyond Newman, with an average age of 69 for federal judges and concerns about declining mental and physical capabilities affecting their ability to discharge duties. Newman’s situation highlights the lack of provisions for addressing the potential incapacity of judges and calls attention to the increasing age of members of Congress and government officials.
The case of Newman sheds light on broader concerns about a potential gerontocracy in the U.S. government, where aging officials may cling to power out of fear of irrelevance. With hundreds of aging judges still serving in various capacities, the issue of when to retire and how to ensure capable replacements is a growing challenge. The Newman case underscores the complexities surrounding the removal of elderly judges and the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing the issue of aging officials in government.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com