French authorities are facing criticism for their broad use of discretionary powers under an anti-terror law to restrict the movements of hundreds of individuals deemed potential security threats ahead of the Olympics. Many of those affected by these measures are minorities with roots in former French colonies, leading to accusations of targeting specific communities.
Individuals subjected to these restrictions include a man with mental health issues, a Muslim business student, and a halal food delivery driver, among others. Despite having no criminal record, these individuals are required to report daily to police and are forbidden from leaving their neighborhoods without prior approval from judges.
Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin defends the measures as necessary to prevent potential attacks during the games, but critics argue that the use of these restrictions is unprecedented and raises concerns about civil liberties. Lawyers representing affected individuals have raised issues with the lack of transparency and the difficulty in challenging these restrictions in court.
The anti-terror law grants the interior minister the authority to restrict the movements of individuals believed to pose a grave security threat with terror ties or sympathies. However, the broad application of these measures has sparked fears of discrimination and unfair targeting of minority communities.
As preparations for the Olympics continue, French authorities are focused on enhancing security measures to prevent any possible terror threats. The use of these discretionary powers under the anti-terror law has raised questions about the balance between security concerns and individual freedoms, with critics calling for more transparency and accountability in the application of these measures.
Source
Photo credit www.euronews.com
